With about eight weeks until the start of the school year, Watertown School officials continue to prepare for three different scenarios — in-person teaching, remote learning, or a mix of the two. Superintendent Dede Galdston told the School Committee Monday that with “the sands shifting everyday” she will not know which of the three will be used until sometime in August.
Massachusetts education officials presented district with guidelines and asked them to come up with plans for how to operate schools in each of the three scenarios.
Galdston said that while it is not clear which of the three will be used for the district as a whole, the Watertown Public Schools must prepare for remote learning because some students will be choosing that option no matter what.
If the schools do return in person, they could try to welcome everyone back, or have students rotate when days they are in school by the day or the week, Galdston said.
Social Distancing in Class
When in classes, the state guidelines call for a preferred 6 feet distance between students, but allows for as little as 3 feet.
“We are going to aim for 6 feet, that is our goal,” Galdston said. “Certainly, no closer than 4, and 5 or 6 feet is what we are aiming for. And with mask being worn at all times, except when there is a mask break and there is 6 feet of distance between students.”
School Committee member Lily Rayman-Read, who is also a teacher in Cambridge, said she does not like the idea of having students being less than 6 feet apart.
“Why is 6 feet acceptable as the barrier in every other social context, but I just heard we are limiting it to 4 feet?” Rayman-Reed said. “This, to me, is beyond unacceptable. The idea we are asking our students, our staff and everyone in our in the community to accept a less stringent safety guideline than in a grocery store or on the beach, to me, is baffling. To me it is not something that can be considered.”
Galdston clarified that in a hybrid system, were some students are in class and some are participating remotely, that the limit will be 6 feet. The state, she said, requires districts to do a feasibility study looking at a 6 foot limit down to a 3 foot limit.
Heather McManus, a resident and parent of an incoming kindergartner, said that the state’s guidelines “misrepresent and misinterpret” a study on the spread of COVID-19 in schools.
McManus, a research scientist who did her doctorate in microbiology and immunology, said the state, “claims that schools do not appear to have played a significant role in COVID transmission. This is not only not supported by current evidence, it is also not supported in the primary scientific article that the reopening plan cites when making the claim.”
She noted that the scientific article used by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, included a French high school where 25 percent of students at one tested positive for COVID-19.
Another parent, Rachel Danford, encouraged the schools to look for ways to make extensive use of outdoor space when doing lesson with students. Danford, who works with Schoolyard Green America to come up with ways schools can use their outdoor space, suggested the district prepare by creating coverings to protect students and teachers from the sun and rain, as well as buying rolling carts for materials and clipboards so papers don’t blow away.
Rayman-Read said that she, and other teachers she knows, desperately want to get back to teaching students the classroom, and believes that remote learning is not an adequate substitute. However, she is concerned about opening schools while the pandemic is still going on and there is no vaccine or cure.
“As a parent and teacher, I’m scared for the lives of our colleagues, the lives our students and our community members,” Rayman-Read said. “I updated my will this summer and updated my life insurance, because I am returning to the classroom in the fall. We are asking educators to put their lives on the line. … We must acknowledge that reopening schools means that people might die. This is an inescapable.”
Protective Gear
To prepare for that, the Watertown schools have ordered protective gear for students and teachers.
“Students in grade 2-12 are going to wear masks. For students in Pre-K to 1, we have purchased an option with a hat with a shield, or some may feel comfortable wearing a mask,” Galdston said. “Yes, I think people are wondering if kids will keep that hat on their head, but we think that they are more apt to do that than wearing a mask.”
Teachers will have their choice of personal protection equipment (PPE): a mask, a face shield with a mask or full PPE.
The WPS has also ordered supplies, Galdston said, and each student will get a box of supplies. That way, families do not have to purchase them, and students do not have to share. At the high school, she added, UV cabinets have been purchased so that they can put in items that might have to be shared, such as calculators.
“We can do some quick disinfecting during the middle of the day,” Galdston said.
Making the Decision
How the Watertown Schools will start the school year will be decided in August, Galdston said. The district has put together a Reopening Task Force to plan for how to approach the start of school in September.
Some of the work that has been done includes surveying students, teachers and parents about their experiences in the spring after schools shutdown, and asking them what they want to see in the fall. So far, about half the parents have responded to the district survey, “but the goal is 75 percent, because it is that important. If we are building a plan based on the feedback we need to reach out and make sure all families fill out the survey.”
The survey was sent to parents in a MailChimp email, and Galston said she would resend it from her account. Also, the survey is being translated into different languages for students in the English as a Second Language program. Others have emailed her for the link (deanne.galdston@watertown.k12.ma.us).
School Committee Chairman John Portz asked whether the School Committee should add a meeting at the end of July to update the community on the planning for reopening. Town Council President Mark Sideris said he thought that was a good idea to make sure people have the latest information as the planning evolves. The meeting will likely be July 27, Portz said, followed by a meeting on Aug. 10 when the final plan would be presented and the School Committee would vote on it.
Food for Thought:
Monday on MSNBC, host Craig Melvin was stunned after NBC News/MSNBC medical correspondent Dr. John Torres’ segment featuring pediatricians saying they would send their kids back to school in the fall with proper precautions like mask-wearing and social distancing plans in place.
Torres interviewed Dr. Yvonne Maldonado in California, Dr. Shilpa A. Patel in New Jersey, Dr. William V. Raszka in Vermont, Dr. Jennifer Lighter in New York and Dr. Buddy Creech in Tennesse.
Melvin said, “We’re hearing a lot from government officials as schools look to reopen during this pandemic but, it’s paramount that we also hear from public health experts. NBC’s Dr. John Torres talked with a group of them about the crucial factors patients need to consider when deciding whether to send their kids back to the classroom.”
Torres said, “As schools struggle with reopening safely, NBC News reached out to five top pediatricians across the country. A random sampling of doctors to find out just how dangerous the coronavirus is for kids. Our experts agree most children don’t get as sick as adults and that serious complications are rare.”
He added, “In fact, kids only account for 2% of all cases. doctors say they don’t expect that number to significantly increase when schools open because kids don’t appear to be good at spreading the virus.”
Dr. Lighter said, “The data that’s come out now seems to show that most transmissions occur from adults to adults or adults to children.”
Torres said, “While many teachers are concerned about reopening school so soon, the five doctors we spoke to agree the benefits of being in the classroom far outweigh the risk of disease. But the key is to reopen safely.”
He added, “All agreed, guidelines should include rules for social distancing, keep desks 3 to 6 feet apart and make sure desks are facing away from each other. They may want to consider holding gym classes outside.”
Torres asked, “Would you let your kids go back to school?”
Dr. Patel said, “I will. My kids are looking forward to it.”
Dr. Raszka said, “Yes, period.”
Dr. Lighter said, “Absolutely. as much as I can.”
She added, “Without a hesitation, yes.”
Dr. Creech said, “I have no concerns about sending my child to school in the fall.”
Dr. Maldonado said, “I would let my kids go back to school.”
After the segment ended a shocked looking, Melvin said, “They all said yes.”
I think I may have been misunderstood. I apologize if I was unclear.
To clarify, the article I discussed did not show the opposite. It showed that no conclusive claims can be made about what role school settings have played in the spread of COVID.
The claim that school settings are less likely to support the spread of COVID, vs other similar indoor settings, has yet to be demonstrated. There are absolutely examples that show spread within school settings. For example, the French High School study that found antibodies in 25% of students, teachers, siblings and family members associated with that cluster.
Also, there is no conclusive evidence that infected children are less likely to transmit coronavirus. The studies the state cite are very limited and need to be viewed through a lens that accounts for strain variants. This is an ongoing and active area of research and discussion.
My main point was that some of the claims the state are using to justify the reopening guidelines are not supported by the evidence.
Without those claims I don’t think it is prudent for the state to recommenced less than 6 feet social distancing and not require masks in grades K and 1st – something that may only be feasible with a hybrid model
Thanks for clarifying
Your welcome. There is also an extra “not” in the text of the article.
it should read: the state claims schools do not appear to have played a major role in COVID 19 transmission.
My computer was having some audio issues last night. Thanks!
I am concerned whether chidren wearing masks for a long period of time will be safe.
Are they getting enough air?
Are they re-breathing their own CO2?
Does it depend on the type of mask?
Here is something to think about, and I would like the opinion of others, particularly doctors:
https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2020/07/this-live-mask-test-shocks-viewers-the-highwire-with-del-bigtree-must-video-3533079.html
That link is an opinion article from a conservative website. Not the best place to find academic articles and studies done by actual doctors.
Doctors, nurses and basically all public workers now wear masks for 8+ hours a day. Myself included. Yes it’s uncomfortable but no you will not become ill from “breathing your own CO2”. Any discomfort caused by wearing a mask certainly outweighs the alternative outcome of becoming infected.
It’s fine to ask questions and educate yourself but unless you have a valid suggestion for an alternative, comments like this are largely unhelpful and spread more nonsense.
German study says low infection rate of Covid-19 in schools:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany-schools/german-study-shows-low-coronavirus-infection-rate-in-schools-idUSKCN24E1R1
I wonder what the compliance rate is for wearing masks and socially distancing as a country is too…does it correlate with low rates thus lower rates in school? In the article it talks about opening schools that are only in low infection rates. The kids also wear masks and socially distance themselves(again would be interesting to see if they are compliant:>).